Nature· 2026Q1
Decoding the regulatory programs governing glioblastoma plasticity
- 12citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new deep-learning framework, scDORI, infers enhancer-driven gene-regulatory networks at single-cell resolution, revealing a structured, hierarchical program governing glioblastoma plasticity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- scDORI, a deep-learning framework, infers enhancer-driven gene-regulatory networks at single-cell resolution.
- Glioblastoma plasticity is governed by a structured, hierarchical regulatory program with asymmetric activator/repressor interplay.
- Low-plasticity states, like neuronal-like, are actively maintained by safeguard repressors, not stable differentiation endpoints.
- MYT1L is identified as a dominant safeguard repressor, consolidating neuronal-like identity by repressing alternative fates.
- MYT1L loss reactivates plasticity and accelerates malignant features, while its presence restricts plasticity and suppresses tumor growth.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Glioblastoma is incurable and resistant to therapy despite genomic stability under treatment 1–8 , suggesting that non-genetic cellular plasticity is a central driver of progression. Whether such plasticity reflects stochastic state switching or is governed by predictable gene regulation has remained unclear 9–13 . Here we introduce scDORI (single-cell deep multi-omic regulatory inference)—a deep-learning framework that infers enhancer-driven gene-regulatory networks at single-cell resolution—and apply it to single-nucleus multiome profiles of more than one million cells from primary glioblastomas. Integrating computational inference with systematic perturbation screens across patient-derived models, we show that a structured regulatory program with an asymmetric interplay of activators and repressors governs cellular plasticity in glioblastoma. The resulting transition landscape is hierarchical and predictable, but permits cross-lineage trajectories that are absent from normal neurodevelopment. Within this landscape, low-plasticity states such as the neuronal-like state are not stable differentiation end points but actively maintained configurations, stabilized by a network of safeguard repressors that silence alternative fates. We identify MYT1L as the dominant member of this network, and show that it binds to and represses master regulators of every alternative state to consolidate neuronal-like identity. MYT1L restricted plasticity even under standard-of-care therapy and suppressed tumour growth and invasion in vivo. Conversely, loss of MYT1L reactivated plasticity and accelerated malignant features, indicating that low-plasticity identity requires continuous repression. These findings reframe malignant cell state stability as a balance between activation and continuous repression, and nominate safeguard repressors as candidate therapeutic targets that are distinct from differentiation-inducing activators, with potential relevance across cancers in which phenotypic switching drives therapy resistance.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nature, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Genetics (Medicine)
Genetics (clinical)Medicine