Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics· 2026Q1
Awareness of textual constructedness: Readerly responses to multimodality in post-postmodernist fictions of the digital
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Readers notice shifts between text and visual elements (emails, texts, social media) in digital-era fictions, employing eleven distinct strategies to process this multimodality and its foregrounding of artificiality.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Readers are aware of and notice shifts between different semiotic modes (text, visuals) in post-postmodernist digital fictions.
- Multimodality in these texts serves as a form of literary self-reflexivity, emphasizing the text's artificiality.
- A new typology of eleven distinct reader strategies for processing foregrounding in multimodal texts has been identified based on empirical evidence.
- Reader responses are influenced by factors such as researcher-led questions versus unsolicited reviews, and immediate versus delayed processing.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article addresses textual constructedness as a particular kind of foregrounding and focuses on the question of how readers deal with multimodality in post-postmodernist fictions of the digital (PPFDs). PPFDs are contemporary print fictions that imitate, incorporate and/or utilize digital media, and also display thematic concerns for the digitally mediated worlds in which they are set. Multimodal PPFDs combine prose segments with visual representations of emails, text messages, social media posts, memos, online forums, tweets, blogs or non-networked software (such as PowerPoint presentations). By triangulating three datasets (namely responses to open questions, Goodreads reviews and reading group data), we address the following interrelated research questions: (1) How does the awareness of textual constructedness manifest itself in readerly responses to multimodal deviations in PPFDs? (2) How can we account for the impact of researcher-led questions versus reviews written without any knowledge of the research project? (3) How does immediate versus delayed post-processing influence readers’ responses? (4) What are the effects of readers reading text passages versus full texts in their responses? (5) How do readers react to different degrees of multimodality in the texts? We show how multimodality acts as a form of literary self-reflexivity that foregrounds a text’s artificiality, provide evidence that readers notice the shifts between semiotic modes, and present a new typology of eleven distinct reading strategies for processing foregrounding in multimodal PPFDs based on empirical evidence. Overall we thus show what happens when readers become aware of shifts between semiotic modes and determine subdimensions of the awareness of textual constructedness.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Literature and Literary Theory
Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities