Psychological Methods· 2026Q1
Correcting for publication bias in multivariate and multilevel meta-analysis: A multivariate step function selection model approach.
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new multivariate step function selection model corrects for publication bias in complex meta-analyses involving dependent effect sizes, outperforming standard models in simulations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Extends the univariate step function selection model to multivariate and multilevel meta-analyses to correct for publication bias.
- Proposes strict and relaxed selection models that assign publication probabilities based on statistical significance of outcomes.
- Demonstrates via simulations that the proposed method, as a sensitivity analysis, outperforms standard models that do not correct for publication bias.
- Highlights that publication probabilities can be imprecisely estimated, even with the proposed method.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Univariate meta-analysis models assume that all effect sizes are independent. This assumption is violated if, for example, two outcomes are reported in a study of interest to the meta-analyst or a study reports multiple experiments administered by the same researchers. The multivariate and multilevel meta-analysis models allow modeling dependent effect sizes. These two models have recently gained in popularity among meta-analysts in psychology, where one of the largest threats to validity of meta-analysis is publication bias where a selective subset of studies remain unpublished. We extend the univariate step function selection model approach, for modeling publication bias, to multivariate and multilevel meta-analyses. We propose strict and relaxed selection models that assign a different publication probability to studies that have only statistically significant outcomes or at least one significant outcome. These two selection models are straightforward approaches for modeling publication bias. Our method can also accommodate more sophisticated alternative selection models, and we discuss possibilities for this. We primarily focus on the method's implementation as a sensitivity analysis where publication probabilities in the selection model are assumed as known but also show how these can be estimated. Simulation studies tailored to two applications show that the proposed method as a sensitivity analysis outperforms the multivariate and multilevel meta-analysis models that do not correct for publication bias. The simulations also show that the publication probability is imprecisely estimated. We offer guidance for applying the proposed method in practice and share R code to facilitate the application of our proposed methodology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Psychological Methods, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyDecision Sciences