Archives of Sexual Behavior· 2026Q1
Visual Sexual Health Communication Assisted by AI: The Case of Synthetic Menstruation Images
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
AI image generators produced unusable text-only outputs in 20% of menstruation prompts and 78.1% of generated images had flaws, indicating current limitations for sexual health communication.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 20.0% of AI-generated images for menstruation prompts resulted in text-only outputs.
- 78.1% of generated menstruation images exhibited visual and/or textual flaws.
- AI-generated images showed a lack of diversity in some human attributes (e.g., body type) but not others (e.g., skin tone).
- Stereotypical depictions of women were observed but not predominant.
- Most images conveyed a neutral or positive portrayal of menstruation, despite common visual symbols like blood and pain.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Public communication about sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) relies on both text and images. A recent development is the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) image generators, which enable rapid, cost-effective, and highly customizable images with appealing aesthetics based on textual requests (prompts). To examine the opportunities and challenges of AI-generated images in SRHR communication, we used the topic of menstruation and developed six research questions (RQs) anchored in the current state of research on AI-supported visual health communication. These questions addressed key areas of concern, such as unsuccessful image creation (RQ1), objective image flaws (RQ2), lack of diversity of human representation (RQ3), stereotypical portrayals of women (RQ4), use of visual symbols (RQ5), and image valence (RQ6). Our study applied 15 AI image generators, 2 user accounts per generator, 5 menstruation-related prompts, 2 prompt languages, and 2 images per prompt, resulting in a sample of N = 600 AI outputs generated in Autumn 2025. All outputs were manually coded using a reliability-tested codebook developed through both deductive and inductive approaches. In 20.0% of cases, menstruation prompts did not produce the requested image but only text output (RQ1). When images were generated, they often (78.1%) exhibited visual and/or textual flaws (RQ2). The images showed a lack of diversity in some human attributes (e.g., body type) but not in others (e.g., skin tone; RQ3). Stereotypical depictions of women were observed but not predominant (RQ4). Common menstruation-related visual symbols (e.g., blood, pain) were identified (RQ5), but most images did not convey a negative portrayal and instead a neutral or positive portrayal of menstruation (RQ6). While results show that initial outputs from AI image generators are often not directly suitable for visual sexual health communication, they might work with targeted refinement. Further research is required to examine the production, characteristics, consumption, and effects of AI-generated images in SRHR communication.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Health Informatics
Health InformaticsMedicine