PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Solar Energy Advances· 2026Q2

Techno-economic analysis of agrivoltaic pear orchards

Frank de Ruijter, Wilma Eerenstein, Marianne Groot, Hellen Elissen et al.

Short summary

A financial model shows that agrivoltaic pear orchards with opaque solar canopies (Slim O) can yield higher net present values (NPVs) than traditional orchards, primarily when PV and orchard establishment occur simultaneously.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Opaque PV modules (Slim O) in agrivoltaic pear orchards showed the highest net present value (NPV) over 25 years, exceeding that of a reference orchard.
  • Simultaneous establishment of the PV system and pear orchard significantly boosts financial feasibility due to shared structural costs.
  • Light transmission varied by PV type: Wide (42%), Slim O (60%), and Slim T (66%), correlating with pear yields of 71%, 81%, and 89% of reference, respectively.
  • Financial outcomes are highly sensitive to electricity prices and discount rates.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

An agrivoltaic financial model was developed to assess the feasibility of a pear orchard with a solar canopy, using pear production data from a pilot study. The pilot in the central Netherlands, was installed over an existing pear orchard (cv. Conference) with 3-m row spacing. Three photovoltaic (PV) structures were tested above the tree rows: Slim O (opaque modules), Slim T (semi-transparent modules), both 1 m wide, and Wide, which contained a similar number of solar cells as Slim T but more glass, designed to keep the crop dry. Light transmission and pear yields were measured over two years. Transmission averaged 42% (Wide), 60% (Slim O), and 66% (Slim T), with corresponding crop yields of 71%, 81%, and 89% of the reference system.The financial model calculated net present values (NPVs) over a 25-year project lifetime, assuming simultaneous orchard establishment and PV installation. The model included investments and operational costs for both the orchard and solar system. Total NPV was highest for Slim O and exceeded that of the reference orchard, whereas the other configurations showed lower or negative NPVs, driven by limited PV profitability and reduced incoming pear cash flow. Sensitivity analysis indicated that financial outcomes were strongly influenced by electricity price and the discount rate.Overall, synergies between pear production and PV energy generation were limited under humid temperate conditions. Benefits primarily emerged when both systems were established simultaneously, allowing shared structural support. To lower investment risks, technological improvements and/or supportive financial or policy measures are required.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Solar Energy Advances, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentEnergy