Gas Science and Engineering· 2026Q1
Cost-efficient proxy modeling with active learning for CO2/N2-enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Active learning reduced reservoir simulation needs by 54% on average for CO2/N2-enhanced gas recovery proxy models, achieving 17.3% higher R-squared and 31.8% lower MSE compared to random selection.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Active learning reduced required simulations by 54% on average compared to random selection for CO2/N2-enhanced gas recovery proxy models.
- Active learning models achieved a 17.3% higher coefficient of determination (R-squared) than random selection models.
- Active learning models showed a 31.8% lower mean squared error compared to random selection models.
- The approach successfully identified the top 2.6% of optimal solutions from 500 scenarios for enhanced gas recovery.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study introduces a combined active learning and deep learning approach to develop a proxy model for carbon dioxide/nitrogen-enhanced gas recovery efficiency. Constructing traditional proxy models requires extensive and expensive training data from numerous reservoir simulations. In contrast to the random selection-based sampling of the control group, active learning optimizes this by selectively acquiring training data from specific reservoir scenarios. Both approaches start with 150 training data points and expand by five after each training session until the model achieves a 0.75 coefficient of determination with the test dataset. Focusing on a carbon dioxide/nitrogen -enhanced gas recovery setup with one injection well and two production wells, the model uses three input parameters to predict 13 output parameters related to gas production/injection volumes and carbon dioxide storage. The results show that active learning significantly reduces the number of required simulations by 54, on average, compared to random selection, thus enhancing efficiency. With the same simulation costs, the active learning models outperform the random selection by achieving a 17.3% higher coefficient of determination and 31.8% lower mean squared error. This improvement allows active learning to more reliably optimize enhanced gas recovery scenarios, identifying the top 2.6% of the optimal solutions from a pool of 500 scenarios, demonstrating its effectiveness in boosting enhanced gas recovery efficiency.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Gas Science and Engineering, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Fuel Technology
Fuel TechnologyEnergy