PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Vegetation Science· 2026Q1

Vegetation Structural Complexity Across Tenerife's Zonal Vegetation Types Captured by Terrestrial Laser Scanning

Samantha Suter, Rüdiger Otto, José María Fernández‐Palacios, Lea de Nascimento Reyes et al.

Short summary

Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) quantified vegetation structural complexity across Tenerife's 6 major zonal vegetation types, revealing significant differences driven by precipitation, with laurel forests showing high complexity and scrublands high variability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) successfully quantified 3D vegetation structural complexity across 6 major vegetation types on Tenerife.
  • The Stand Structural Complexity Index (SSCI) varied significantly, with laurel forests showing high complexity and low variability, while scrublands displayed high variability.
  • Vegetation types differed in vertical stratification and canopy openness, with forests being more stratified and closed-canopy compared to scrublands.
  • Higher annual precipitation was linearly associated with increased SSCI, vertical stratification, and canopy height, and decreased canopy openness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Questions Vegetation structural complexity, defined as the density and distribution of plants in three‐dimensional (3D) space, is a key ecological property of plant communities, influencing biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Yet, how vegetation structural complexity varies across contrasting vegetation types, and which factors drive this variation remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap is particularly relevant on oceanic islands, where diverse vegetation types occur across steep environmental gradients and are often highly vulnerable to disturbance. Specifically, we asked (1) how does vegetation structural complexity vary across and within‐vegetation types, (2) by which structural dimensions do the vegetation types most differ, and (3) which climatic factors explain this variation. Location Tenerife, Canary Islands. Methods With 140 scans in 28 plots covering 6 major zonal vegetation types, we derived the Stand Structural Complexity Index (SSCI), which measures the 3D arrangement of vegetation, and other metrics related to vertical stratification, vegetation density and canopy openness, captured by terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) 3D point clouds. For each metric, mean values and coefficient of variation (CV) per plot were analysed with a permutation analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a principal component analysis (PCA). The relationship with long‐term climatic plot data was analysed using robust linear models. Results The SSCI differed significantly across zonal vegetation types (permutation ANOVA, p < 0.001). The SSCI ranged from a high mean value and low variability in laurel forests (mean = 7.00, CV = 10.1%) to the lowest mean value in the summit scrub (mean = 2.65, CV = 65.6%) but highest variability in the tabaibal coastal scrub (mean = 4.93, CV = 91.0%). PCA indicates that vegetation structural complexity in forests was characterised by high vertical stratification and a closed canopy. In contrast, scrub types displayed greater canopy openness and a high variation in 3D vegetation density. Greater annual precipitation was associated with a linear increase in SSCI across zonal vegetation types, positively related to increased vertical stratification and canopy height and negatively related to canopy openness and 3D vegetation density. Conclusions Our results suggest that TLS‐derived metrics of vegetation structural complexity capture within and across vegetation type variation. The SSCI can provide meaningful information beyond forests when interpreted alongside other structural metrics. Our results suggest that differences across vegetation types are associated with climatic gradients. This study provides a basis for future studies and applications of TLS beyond forests that can aid biodiversity monitoring and conservation of environmentally distinct and disturbance‐prone island vegetation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

ForestryAgricultural and Biological Sciences