Genealogy· 2026Q1
Abū al-Ghāzī Bahadur Khan’s Genealogical Narrative in Shajara-i Tarākima
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Abū al-Ghāzī Bahadur Khan's "Shajara-i Tarākima" is not just a record of lineage but a genealogical narrative that actively reconfigures the past, organizing and evaluating descent, status, knowledge, and belonging based on specific criteria.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Abū al-Ghāzī Bahadur Khan's "Shajara-i Tarākima" is analyzed for explicit narrator perspective.
- Narrator-centered passages were identified via self-reference, personal experience, and narrative intervention.
- Social order in the text is represented through six dimensions: authority, knowledge, language, genealogy, migration, and narrative management.
- Khan actively selects, organizes, and evaluates lineage, status, knowledge, and belonging.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study examines how Abū al-Ghāzī Bahadur Khan represents and evaluates historical events and the social and political relations surrounding them in Shajara-i Tarākima, focusing on passages in which his perspective as narrator is explicit. Employing a historical research design, the study first identified narrative units in which Abū al-Ghāzī’s position as narrator becomes explicit. These units were subsequently coded and analyzed thematically using a qualitative content analysis approach. The analysis focused on narrator-centered passages identified through indicators of self-reference, personal experience and eyewitness testimony, explicit narrative intervention, evaluative statements, and contextual inference. The findings show that social order in Shajara-i Tarākima is represented through six interrelated dimensions: political authority and moral responsibility; epistemic authority and critical verification; language, audience, and access to knowledge; genealogy and collective belonging; migration, settlement, and social order; and narrative management and the author–reader relationship. The findings further demonstrate that Abū al-Ghāzī does more than transmit genealogical knowledge: he selects, organizes, and evaluates lineage, status, knowledge, and communal belonging according to particular value-based and epistemic criteria. Accordingly, Shajara-i Tarākima can be understood not simply as a historical text that records lines of descent, but as a genealogical narrative that reconfigures the past through genealogical categories, social relations, and narrator positioning. The study therefore demonstrates that genealogical narratives provide insight not only into the transmission of lineage and descent, but also into the narrative construction of social order, belonging, and authority.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Genealogy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Literature and Literary Theory
Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities