Computers & Electrical Engineering· 2026Q1
Embedded Decomposed Transformer for explainable multivariate time series forecasting
- 5citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
The Embedded Decomposed Transformer (EDformer) forecasts multivariate time series by decomposing inputs into seasonal and trend components using time-domain Average Pooling and Frequency-Aware methods, achieving competitive performance across real-world datasets.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- EDformer decomposes multivariate time series into seasonal and trend components using Average Pooling and Frequency-Aware methods.
- The seasonal component is embedded and processed with attention to capture cross-variate correlations.
- The trend component is forecast separately and combined with the seasonal prediction for the final output.
- EDformer achieves competitive performance on real-world datasets, though effectiveness varies.
- Model explainability techniques are explored to enhance interpretability.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Time series forecasting is an important problem with diverse real-world applications. This paper introduces the Embedded Decomposed Transformer (EDformer) for multivariate time series forecasting. EDformer decomposes the input signal into seasonal and trend components using two complementary strategies: time-domain Average Pooling (AP) based on moving-average smoothing and Frequency-Aware (FA) decomposition based on low-pass filtering in the Fourier domain. The reconstructed multivariate seasonal component is embedded across inverted dimensions, after which attention captures cross-variate correlations and a feed-forward network learns nonlinear representations for each variable. The trend component is forecast through projection and combined with the seasonal prediction to produce the final forecast. We evaluate both decomposition variants on several real-world datasets, showing that EDformer achieves competitive performance, while their relative effectiveness varies across datasets, experimental settings, and temporal characteristics. We further conduct an ablation study isolating the contribution of decomposition, inverted embedding, and the frequency cutoff ratio; a hyperparameter sensitivity analysis over learning rate and batch size; and a statistical significance analysis using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to substantiate the reported performance differences. Finally, model explainability techniques are explored to improve interpretability and provide insights into the features and time steps influencing the forecasting results.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Signal Processing
Signal ProcessingComputer Science