SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization· 2026Q1
Convergence of Machine Learning Methods for Feedback Control Laws: Averaged Feedback Learning Scheme and Data-Driven Methods
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Averaged Feedback Learning Scheme (AFLS) and data-driven methods achieve similar performance in optimal feedback control when the value function is smooth, but AFLS outperforms the data-driven method when the value function is non-differentiable.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- AFLS and data-driven methods for optimal feedback control are shown to be connected via their optimality conditions.
- Convergence hypotheses for AFLS require Hölder continuity of the value function, while data-driven methods require at least [Formula: see text].
- Numerical experiments confirm similar performance for both methods when the value function is smooth.
- AFLS exhibits better performance than the data-driven method when the value function is non-differentiable.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract. This work addresses the synthesis of optimal feedback control laws via machine learning. In particular, the averaged feedback learning scheme (AFLS) and a data-driven method are considered. Hypotheses for each method ensuring the convergence of the evaluation of the objective function of the underlying control problem at the obtained feedback laws toward the optimal value function are provided. These hypotheses are connected to the regularity of the value function and the stability of the dynamics. In the case of AFLS, these hypotheses only require Hölder continuity of the value function, whereas for the data-driven method, the value function must be at least [Formula: see text]. It is demonstrated that these methods are connected via their optimality conditions. Additionally, numerical experiments are provided by applying both methods to a family of control problems, parameterized by a positive real number, which controls the regularity of the value function. For small parameters, the value function is smooth, and in contrast with large parameters, it is nondifferentiable but semiconcave. The results of the experiments indicate that both methods have a similar performance for the case that the value function is smooth. On the other hand, if the value function is not differentiable, then AFLS has a better performance, consistent with the obtained convergence results.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Control and Systems Engineering
Control and Systems EngineeringEngineering