PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment· 2026Q2

Spray coverage, droplet density, and efficacy of drone fungicide applications in corn

Simerjeet Singh Virk, Simerjeet Virk, Robert C. Kemerait, Coleman Byers et al.

Short summary

Drone fungicide applications in corn showed variable spray coverage (0.2%-3.4%) and increased coverage/droplet density with higher spray volumes (46.8 L ha−1 vs 18.7 L ha−1). The DJI T40 with rotary atomizers achieved higher droplet density than the DJI T30 with hydraulic nozzles.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Spray coverage in corn canopies ranged from 0.2% to 3.4%, with significant variability.
  • Higher spray volumes (46.8 L ha−1) consistently increased spray coverage and droplet density for both DJI T30 and T40 drones.
  • The DJI T40 drone, equipped with rotary atomizers, achieved significantly higher droplet density than the DJI T30 drone with hydraulic nozzles.
  • Higher spray volume (46.8 L ha−1) improved fungicide efficacy by enhancing disease control in corn over two years.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The use of spray drones in agriculture, particularly for applying fungicides in corn, is advancing rapidly. Therefore, understanding their application performance is important for effective crop management. Studies were conducted to assess spray coverage and droplet density within the corn ( Zea mays L.) canopy at two spray volumes (18.7 and 46.8 L ha −1 ) using two commercially available spray drones (DJI Agras T30 and T40). For the DJI T30, each spray volume was applied at three different heights of 2.2, 3.0, and 3.8 m above the corn canopy, while for T40, both spray volumes were applied at a fixed height of 2.2 m. Further, fungicide applications were conducted using the DJI T30 drone at two spray volumes, and disease control and corn yield were recorded to assess efficacy. Spray coverage ranged from 0.2% to 3.4%, with high variability observed across the swath and within the corn canopy. Coverage and droplet density increased with spray volume across both drones. Application height did not affect coverage, but its effect on droplet density varied by volume. Both drone types showed comparable coverage, but the DJI T40 (rotary atomizers) had significantly higher droplet density than the DJI T30 (hydraulic nozzles). For fungicide applications, the higher spray volume (46.8 L ha −1 ) improved disease control in both years. Corn yield was similar across both spray volumes and the untreated control. Overall, the results indicate that spray drones can be a valid tool for timely fungicide applications to support effective disease management in corn production.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Mechanical Engineering

Mechanical EngineeringEngineering