PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2026Q1

TAVR in Patients with Moderate Aortic Stenosis with At-Risk Features

Philippe Généreux, Raj Makkar, Philippe Pibarot, Jeroen Joost Bax et al.

Short summary

In patients with moderate aortic stenosis and at-risk features, transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) reduced the incidence of death or heart failure events by 7.2 percentage points at 2 years compared to clinical surveillance (16.7% vs. 23.9%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • TAVR reduced the primary endpoint (death or heart failure event) by 7.2 percentage points at 2 years compared to clinical surveillance.
  • The incidence of the primary endpoint was 16.7% in the TAVR group and 23.9% in the clinical surveillance group.
  • No meaningful difference in procedure-related adverse events was observed between the groups.
  • The study included patients with moderate aortic stenosis and at least one at-risk feature.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with moderate aortic stenosis, current guidelines recommend clinical surveillance with echocardiographic assessment every 1 or 2 years. Whether transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) will improve outcomes in these patients remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted an international, open-label, randomized trial to evaluate whether TAVR will result in better outcomes than clinical surveillance among patients with moderate aortic stenosis with at least one at-risk feature (i.e., a symptom or structural or functional abnormality that has been shown to be associated with faster disease progression or adverse cardiovascular outcomes). The patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo transfemoral TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve or clinical surveillance. The primary effectiveness end point was a composite of death from any cause or a heart-failure event with or without hospitalization at 2 years. Superiority testing was performed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: , and the mean aortic-valve peak velocity was 3.3 m per second. At 2 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with a primary effectiveness end-point event was 16.7% in the TAVR group and 23.9% in the clinical-surveillance group (risk difference, -7.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -13.1 to -1.3; P = 0.02 for superiority). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients who died from any cause was 8.4% in the TAVR group and 7.3% in the clinical-surveillance group; the estimates for a heart-failure event were 10.8% and 19.0%, respectively. The incidence of procedure-related adverse events did not differ meaningfully between the patients in the TAVR group and those in the clinical-surveillance group who underwent aortic-valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with moderate aortic stenosis and at-risk features, a strategy of TAVR was superior to clinical surveillance in lowering the incidence of death or a heart-failure event at 2 years. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; PROGRESS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04889872.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineMedicine