PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Proposal for new cut-off points for vital signs used to identify at-risk patients over 65 years old in Emergency Departments

Diana M. Pérez-Valencia, Irantzu Barrio, Juan María González del Castillo, Cesáreo Fernández Alonso et al.

Short summary

New vital sign thresholds for patients over 65 in the ED identify 66.1% more at-risk individuals for RR, 28.2% for SBP, and 14.8% for HR compared to traditional criteria.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • New vital sign thresholds were developed for patients >= 65 years in EDs.
  • Optimized cut-offs include SBP 115/185 mmHg, DBP 97 mmHg, RR 15/21 bpm, HR 45/105 bpm, and SatO2 92%.
  • These thresholds identified 66.1% more at-risk patients for RR, 28.2% for SBP, and 14.8% for HR compared to traditional criteria.
  • The study used a retrospective cohort of 23,278 ED visits from 52 Spanish hospitals.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding and non-age-adapted triage criteria increase the risk of delayed recognition of critical conditions in older adults, who face higher morbidity, atypical presentations, and poorer short-term outcomes. We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study including 23,278 ED visits (patients ≥ 65 years) from 52 Spanish hospitals, drawn from the EDEN (Emergency Department and Elder Needs) cohort. Triage-recorded vital signs were analysed regarding mortality or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission within 72 h. Candidate optimal cut-offs were estimated using the BackAddFor algorithm within univariate logistic generalized additive models (GAMs). Thresholds were selected to maximise the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). External validation was performed in an independent cohort. Cut-offs were proposed for five vital signs: systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 115 and 185 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 97 mmHg, respiratory rate (RR) at 15 and 21 bpm, heart rate (HR) at 45 and 105 bpm, and oxygen saturation (SatO2) at 92%. Compared with conventional values, these adapted cut-offs classified as alarm a greater proportion of patients at risk who would not have been classified as high priority according to traditional criteria: 66.1% for RR, 28.2% for SBP, 14.8% for HR, 8.6% for SatO2, and 6.6% for DBP. Findings support the identification of candidate age-adapted thresholds for older ED patients and motivate future predictive models incorporating vital sign interactions to enhance early warning systems in EDs.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Emergency Medicine

Emergency MedicineMedicine