Journal of Population Research· 2026Q2
Beyond linear risks: non-linear associations and gender asymmetry in spousal age differences and marital stability
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Very large spousal age gaps (>10 years) are linked to substantially lower divorce hazards, a pattern concentrated in male-older unions, unlike female-older unions where age differences show little divorce risk association.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Very large spousal age gaps (>10 years) are associated with substantially lower divorce hazards.
- This pattern of reduced divorce risk with large age gaps is concentrated in male-older unions.
- Age differences in female-older marriages show little association with divorce risk.
- Moderate age differences (4-10 years) have divorce risks similar to age-homogamous marriages.
- The study used longitudinal data from the HILDA Survey and Cox proportional hazards models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Spousal age differences are a salient dimension of assortative matching in marriage markets, yet evidence on their relationship with marital stability remains mixed and often uses linear specifications. This study examines whether spousal age differences are associated with the risk of first divorce and whether large age gaps reflect distinct types of unions within gendered marriage markets. Using longitudinal data from Waves 1–20 of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, we estimate Cox proportional hazards models of first divorce. Age differences are modelled both continuously and categorically to capture non-linearities and to distinguish between male-older and female-older unions. The results show a non-linear pattern across the specified age-gap categories that differs by gender direction. Moderate age differences (4–10 years) are associated with divorce risks similar to age-homogamous marriages, whereas very large age gaps (> 10 years) are linked to substantially lower divorce hazards. This pattern is concentrated in male-older unions, while age differences in female-older marriages show little association with divorce risk. The associations persist after covariate adjustment. Selective matching remains a possible explanation, but the analysis neither establishes selection as the cause nor rules out causal pathways related to age differences. More broadly, the results highlight the importance of non-linear associations and gender asymmetry in understanding how marriage markets structure union stability.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Population Research, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Demography
DemographySocial Sciences