PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Oral Health· 2026Q1

Masseter ultrasonographic characteristics across clinically defined groups of antidepressant users and non-user controls: a cross-sectional study

Alperen Tekın, Belde Arsan, Burcu Sümer, Büşra Erdoğan

Short summary

Antidepressant users with probable bruxism (G1) showed significantly larger masseter muscle thickness, volume, strain-elastography values, and fractal dimension compared to antidepressant users without bruxism (G2) and non-users (G3).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Antidepressant users with probable bruxism (G1) had significantly higher resting and clenching masseter thickness, estimated volume, reciprocal strain-elastography values, and resting fractal dimension than G2 and G3.
  • Masseter muscle thickness, estimated volume, and reciprocal strain-elastography metric increased from rest to clench in all groups.
  • Between-group differences in masseter ultrasound measurements remained statistically significant after adjusting for covariates.
  • The study used data from 123 adults across three groups: antidepressant users with probable bruxism (n=42), antidepressant users without bruxism (n=31), and non-antidepressant controls without bruxism (n=50).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Masseter ultrasonographic characteristics remain incompletely described in antidepressant users with differing clinical bruxism classifications. This study compared three predefined clinical groups. Methods This single-center cross-sectional study used prospectively acquired clinical and imaging data from 123 adults: antidepressant users with clinically defined probable bruxism and a self-reported temporal association (G1, n = 42), antidepressant users without probable bruxism (G2, n = 31), and non-antidepressant controls without probable bruxism (G3, n = 50). For G1, recalled onset or worsening of bruxism-related complaints after treatment initiation was recorded during anamnesis; this chronology was entirely retrospective. Bilateral thickness, estimated volume, and a reciprocal strain-elastography metric were measured at rest and during voluntary clenching; fractal dimension was calculated from resting images. Nonparametric comparisons, adjusted regression models, and secondary inter-parameter correlations were performed. Results G1 had higher resting and clenching thickness, estimated volume, reciprocal strain-elastography values, and resting fractal dimension than G2 and G3. Thickness, estimated volume, and the reciprocal strain-elastography metric increased from rest to clench in all groups. Between-group differences remained statistically evident in models adjusted for the measured covariates. Conclusions Masseter ultrasound-derived measurements differed among the predefined clinical groups. These findings do not establish the onset or progression of bruxism, a causal effect of antidepressant use, or a medication-specific muscle phenotype.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Oral Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Oral Surgery

Oral SurgeryDentistry