Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
Cross-site pooling with feature harmonization for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) prediction across heterogeneous feature spaces
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new cross-site pooling framework with feature harmonization enables small-for-gestational-age (SGA) prediction across heterogeneous Malaysian and Indian antenatal datasets, achieving AUROCs of 0.823 in Malaysia and 0.673 in India, comparable to country-specific models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A novel cross-site pooling framework was developed for SGA prediction using heterogeneous Malaysian and Indian antenatal data.
- The framework incorporates feature-specific imputation and leakage-safe partitioning.
- Feature harmonization enabled integration of datasets with differing feature spaces, achieving AUROCs of 0.823 (Malaysia) and 0.673 (India).
- Performance was comparable to country-specific models, particularly in Malaysia (0.823 vs. 0.825) and numerically higher in India (0.673 vs. 0.553).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates face health risks when undetected, yet machine learning (ML) models are difficult to apply across sites with heterogeneous feature availability. We developed a cross-site pooling framework, incorporating feature-specific imputation and leakage-safe five-fold partitioning, for SGA prediction using Malaysian ( n = 18,582) and Indian ( n = 1,760) antenatal data. The framework is evaluated on a held-out partition of 853 complete records including 184 SGA events. Three training strategies were evaluated: (i) country-specific training using common features (baseline), (ii) pooled training with feature harmonization, and (iii) cross-country transfer using common features. In the Malaysia test set ( n = 807, 169 SGA), the AUROCs were 0.825, 0.823, and 0.606, whereas in India test set ( n = 46, 15 SGA), they were 0.553, 0.673, and 0.695. The feature-harmonized approach showed results similar to the country-specific baseline in Malaysia (0.823 vs. 0.825) and numerically higher than the India-only baseline in India (0.673 vs. 0.553) with wide overlapping CIs on 46 scans (15 SGA). In a training size-matched analysis, pooling Malaysian data raised India AUROC from 0.573 to 0.653 (95% CI 0.604–0.706) while adding the harmonized feature gave 0.655 (95% CI 0.608–0.706), no measurable difference. Compared to clinical diagnosis using EFW<10th centile, the model achieved slightly lower AUROC (Malaysia: 0.823 vs. 0.838; India: 0.673 vs. 0.695). We showed that cross-site pooling was feasible despite heterogeneous feature availability. Feature harmonization enabled integration of datasets with differing feature spaces rather than providing discriminative gain. Independent validation on unseen sites, clinically justified operating thresholds, and prospective evaluation are required before clinical deployment.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Health Information Management
Health Information ManagementHealth Professions