Anthropology & Humanism· 2026Q1
Exhibiting AI images: Unexpected outputs, linguistic inequalities, and curatorial possibilities
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
AI image generators produce unexpected outputs that challenge stereotypes and reveal linguistic inequalities, as demonstrated by the 'World Hypnosis Convention' exhibition.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- AI image generators can create unexpected outputs by connecting semantic associations in their latent data spaces.
- The 'World Hypnosis Convention' exhibition used AI images to challenge stereotypes and reveal the social imagination of hypnosis.
- English prompts generated standardized male stage performer portraits, while other languages produced vivid, unexpected images.
- AI image generation exhibits linguistic inequalities, limiting non-English speakers' precision and potentially causing English speakers to miss lateral perspectives.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Structured around latent data spaces that store masses of semantic associations, AI image generators have an intrinsic capacity to draw connections their users might not expect. Their outputs thus have the potential to engender characteristically anthropological epistemic shifts: subverting pernicious stereotypes, opening up horizons of possibility, and rendering the familiar strange. I demonstrate this with reference to World Hypnosis Convention , a collage of AI images that I developed for a public exhibition following long‐term fieldwork on the social imagination of hypnosis. While English‐language prompts generated highly standardized portraits of male stage performers, other languages elicited vivid, unexpected portraits that challenged rigid definitions of “hypnosis,” drew attention to the constitutive role of suggestion in social life, and invited critical perspectives on social institutions. World Hypnosis Convention thus demonstrates how AI images can support practices of anthropological exhibiting, while illuminating several limitations of AI image generation itself. In particular, it highlights the linguistic inequalities with which AI users can be faced: non‐English speakers may struggle to achieve the precision they may desire, whereas English speakers can miss out on lateral perspectives. Both issues warrant greater attention in critical anthropologies of AI and in future AI design.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Anthropology & Humanism, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Visual Arts and Performing ArtsArts and Humanities