PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Journal of Law and Economics· 2026Q1

Revolutionary Constitutional Compliance

Jamie Bologna Pavlik, Justin T Callais, Andrew T. Young

Short summary

Constitutions adopted after revolutions lead to higher compliance with their provisions for at least 5 years, particularly for basic human and civil rights, compared to non-revolutionary constitutions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Constitutions adopted after revolutions demonstrate higher compliance rates than non-revolutionary ones.
  • This positive compliance effect is observable for at least 5 years following the adoption of a revolutionary constitution.
  • The compliance advantage of revolutionary constitutions is particularly pronounced for basic human and civil rights provisions.
  • The overall positive compliance effect diminishes by the 10-year mark but remains significant for rights provisions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Revolutions are bottom-up movements for regime change that, if successful, overthrow and replace a society’s principal institutions. Successful revolutions are often followed by a new Constitution. We explore whether revolutionary Constitutions, all else equal, lead to higher compliance than their non-revolutionary counterparts. To do so we combine data from the Comparative Constitutional Compliance Database and the Revolutionary Episodes Dataset. We identify 15 revolutionary Constitutions, adopted between 1976 and 2010, and consider their compliance relative to that of their predecessors. We employ matching methods, drawing on up to 61 cases of (non-revolutionary) Constitutional adoptions to construct counterfactual episodes. Constitutions lead to higher compliance at least 5 years out from their adoption. At 10 years out, the positive overall compliance effect gets weaker. However, the effect remains significant for basic human and civil rights provisions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Journal of Law and Economics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Sociology and Political Science

Sociology and Political ScienceSocial Sciences