PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture· 2026Q1

Self-supervised adaptation of vision foundation models for fine-grained plant species and damage assessment in herbicide trials

Leire Benito-Del-Valle, Artzai Picón, Daniel Múgica, Manuel Ramos et al.

Short summary

A self-supervised adapted vision model achieves higher accuracy (0.94 F1 for species ID, 0.33 for damage) than general models in herbicide trials, especially under unseen conditions and with less data.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Self-supervised adaptation of a vision foundation model improved species identification F1 score from 0.91 to 0.94 and damage classification from 0.26 to 0.33 in herbicide trials.
  • The adapted model showed substantial gains under unseen conditions (species ID: 0.66 vs 0.56; damage: 0.27 vs 0.17) and in drone imagery (species ID: 0.60 vs 0.49).
  • Domain-specific pretraining enhanced segmentation accuracy, especially with limited annotations.
  • The adapted model achieved a 5.4% higher F1 score with 80% fewer labeled samples under unseen conditions compared to general models.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Herbicide field trials require accurate identification of plant species and assessment of herbicide-induced damage across diverse environments. While general-purpose vision foundation models have shown promising results in complex visual domains, their performance can be limited in agriculture, where fine-grained distinctions between species and damage types are critical.In this work, we adapt a general-purpose vision foundation model to herbicide trial characterization. Trained using a self-supervised learning approach on a large, curated agricultural dataset, the model learns rich and transferable representations optimized for herbicide trials images.Our domain-specific model significantly outperforms the best general-purpose foundation model in both species identification (F1 score improvement from 0.91 to 0.94) and damage classification (from 0.26 to 0.33). Under unseen conditions (new locations and other time), it achieves even greater gains (species identification from 0.56 to 0.66; damage classification from 0.17 to 0.27). In domain-shift scenarios, such as drone imagery, it maintains strong performance (species classification from 0.49 to 0.60). Additionally, we show that domain-specific pretraining enhances segmentation accuracy, particularly in low-annotation regimes. An annotation-efficiency analysis reveals that, under unseen conditions, the domain-specific model achieves 5.4% higher F1 score than the general-purpose model, while using 80% fewer labeled samples.These results demonstrate the generalization capabilities of domain-specific foundation models and their potential to significantly reduce manual annotation efforts, offering a scalable and automated solution for herbicide trial analysis.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Plant Science

Plant ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences