PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Agronomy for Sustainable Development· 2026Q1

Sustainable crop production under future climates: national mapping of cover-crop rotations and soil organic carbon–N2O trade-offs

Ahmed Attia, Donghui Ma, Michelle Viswanathan, Asmae Meziane et al.

Short summary

Diversified 4-year cover-crop rotations with legumes increase cereal yields by 16-33%, improve N use efficiency, reduce N leaching by 40%, and lower net greenhouse gases by 35-45% on average by 2099 under future climates (RCP4.5/8.5) in Germany.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Legume-inclusive cover-crop rotations increased cereal yields by 16-33% and improved nitrogen use efficiency.
  • These systems reduced nitrogen leaching by approximately 40% compared to business-as-usual rotations.
  • Net greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 35-45% on average by 2099, considering soil organic carbon gains and N₂O accounting.
  • Spatial 'leverage maps' identify regions where rotation redesign most effectively balances production, N loss, and GHG reduction.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Sustainable crop production increasingly depends on rotation designs that raise productivity while lowering reactive nitrogen (N) losses and net greenhouse gases. We conduct a national, spatial analysis for Germany, evaluating diversified 4-year rotations with alternating legume/non-legume cover crops (CCs) under future climates (RCP4.5/8.5, six GCMs). Using the DSSAT crop–soil model coupled to dynamic Tier-2 N₂O accounting (driven by DSSAT-simulated fertilizer, residue, and leached N), we map impacts on yield, N use efficiency (NUE), N leaching, ΔSOC, and net GHG relative to business-as-usual rotations. Across the ensemble, legume-inclusive CC sequences increase cereal yields by ~16–33% (zone-dependent), improve NUE, and reduce N leaching by ~40%. Systems accrue additional SOC but approach plateaus over decades; N₂O responses are climate- and soil-contingent, yet the net GHG footprint falls by ~35–45% on average through 2099 when ΔSOC and direct + indirect N₂O are jointly considered. Accounting for upstream seed and diesel for CCs may slightly attenuates (but does not negate) the net benefit. Spatial “leverage maps” reveal where rotation redesign most robustly delivers the triad of higher production, lower N losses, and lower net GHG, and where trade-offs persist. Results provide policy-ready evidence that targeted, legume-inclusive cover-crop rotations can advance cleaner crop production in temperate regions under changing climate.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Soil Science

Soil ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences