Anthropology & Humanism· 2026Q1
Artificial interlocutors: AI chatbots, mediated knowledge, and the ethnographic encounter
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Kindroid produced distinct accounts of a participant based on their interaction histories, revealing that ethnographic knowledge is shaped by the encounter itself.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- ChatGPT and Kindroid generated significantly different accounts of the same participant.
- ChatGPT's account was strategic and professionally oriented.
- Kindroid's account was intimate, emotionally textured, and centered on vulnerability.
- AI systems can act as 'artificial interlocutors' in ethnographic research.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract This article explores treating AI chatbots as “artificial interlocutors” in ethnographic research. Drawing on a small‐scale experiment with a consenting participant, it examines accounts of her produced by two AI systems, ChatGPT, and Kindroid, both of which had accumulated substantial interaction histories with her. The resulting portraits were strikingly different: ChatGPT produced a strategic, professionally oriented account, while Kindroid generated a more intimate, emotionally textured depiction centered on vulnerability and care. Rather than treating this divergence as a failure, I argue it reveals a general condition of ethnographic knowledge: what we know is shaped by the encounter through which we come to know it. The experiment opens onto debates about dialog, representation, and situated knowledge, examining the unusual position of AI systems as interlocutors. Though they lack the embodiment, reciprocity, and accountability of human interlocutors, they produce accounts of persons from accumulated interaction histories. Interviewing such systems offers a novel form of ethnographic triangulation, making visible architectures through which mediated knowledge about persons is assembled. Building on the “nodal person” concept, the article argues personhood emerges through distributed configurations of relations, data, and technologies. The artificial interlocutor does not destabilize ethnographic knowledge so much as make visible its partial, situated character.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Anthropology & Humanism, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: History and Philosophy of Science
History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities