PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Water· 2026Q1

Decision Support Tool to Assess Legionella and Mycobacterium avium Complex Risks from Common Indoor Water Uses

Ryan Julien, Hongwan Li, Patrick L. Gurian, Mark H. Weir et al.

Short summary

A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) framework models inhalation risks from Legionella and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) during showering, toilet flushing, and handwashing, finding Legionella poses a higher risk, particularly from showers.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A QMRA framework quantifies inhalation risks from Legionella and MAC during showering, toilet flushing, and handwashing.
  • Legionella spp. was modeled to present a higher risk of infection compared to Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC).
  • Showering scenarios yielded the highest modeled infection risks, while handwashing scenarios yielded the lowest.
  • Model sensitivity analysis revealed that exposure dose and bulk water pathogen concentration are the primary drivers of risk.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Opportunistic pathogens such as Legionella spp. (including Legionella pneumophila) and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) are common within building plumbing systems. These opportunistic pathogens can be amplified by conditions of premise plumbing, including diminished disinfectant residual, high surface area to volume ratios resulting from smaller-diameter pipes, and elevated water temperatures compared to distribution mains. Understanding the risk of infection from these pathogens through common exposure pathways is critical to addressing and mitigating human health risks. This study presents a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) framework for inhalation exposures to aerosolized Legionella spp. and MAC during three common residential water uses, showering, toilet flushing, and handwashing. Inhalation risks were quantified by Monte Carlo simulation of bulk water pathogen concentrations, size-specific aerosol generation, respiratory deposition, and dose–response assessment. Because co-located paired measurements for Legionella spp. and MAC were limited, organism-specific results reflect modeled concentration distributions and dose–response assumptions rather than direct field co-occurrence comparisons. Across modeled scenarios, Legionella spp. presents a higher risk of infection than MAC. Risks were greatest for shower exposures and lowest for handwashing. Correlation analysis shows that risks are most sensitive to exposure dose (ρ > 0.99) and the concentration of pathogen in bulk water (ρ > 0.96).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Water, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

EndocrinologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology