International Journal of Financial Studies· 2026Q2
Technological Adoption and Gender Gaps in Financial Innovation: Evidence from Mobile Payments in Peru and Ecuador
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Mobile payment adoption shows a statistically significant gender difference in the effect of perceived security on performance expectancy (stronger in men), with men also having a higher overall explanatory power (R²=0.838 vs 0.779) for adoption intention in Peru and Ecuador.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A significant gender difference was confirmed in the effect of perceived security on performance expectancy, which was stronger among men.
- Men showed a higher overall explanatory power (R²=0.838) for mobile payment adoption intention compared to women (R²=0.779).
- Perceived privacy and effort expectancy were significant adoption drivers only for women.
- The study analyzed data from 1122 respondents in Peru and Ecuador using PLS-SEM and multigroup analysis.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Mobile payments in Latin America have grown rapidly, but gender gaps in their adoption persist and are not fully understood. This study examines how gender moderates the determinants of intention to accept mobile payments in Peru and Ecuador, using an expanded UTAUT model that adds perceived privacy, security, and technological competence, along with performance expectancy, effort expectancy, attitude, social influence, and facilitating conditions. We collected data through an online survey with purposive sampling, yielding 1122 valid responses (711 Ecuadorian and 411 Peruvian), and analyzed them using PLS-SEM and multigroup analysis. Seven of the nine hypothesized relationships were significant within both gender groups when estimated separately, while perceived privacy and effort expectancy were significant only among women. However, a formal permutation-based comparison of path coefficients between groups confirmed a statistically significant gender difference only for the effect of perceived security on performance expectancy (stronger among men), with a marginal trend for perceived privacy; the remaining observed differences in coefficient magnitude were not statistically significant between groups. The model explained a substantial proportion of the variance in intention to use for both men (R2 = 0.838) and women (R2 = 0.779), with a consistently higher R2 for men across all four endogenous variables. These results suggest that gender exerts a specific, empirically confirmed moderating effect on the role of trust-related beliefs in mobile payment adoption, alongside broader differences in the model’s overall explanatory power between men and women, with implications for gender-responsive financial inclusion policies in Latin America.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Financial Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Information Systems and Management
Information Systems and ManagementDecision Sciences