PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Current Transplantation Reports· 2026Q2

Immunosuppression Strategies Including the Use of Belatacept, mTOR Inhibitors and Steroid-Sparing Protocols

Sambhavi Krishnamoorthy, Yvonne El Kassis, Beatrice P. Concepcion, Yousuf Kyeso

Short summary

Pancreas transplant recipients can avoid long-term CNI-induced nephrotoxicity and metabolic issues by switching to belatacept or mTOR inhibitors, with late conversion to low-dose CNI and belatacept showing improved allograft survival and lower rejection rates.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CNI-based immunosuppression in pancreas transplants causes long-term nephrotoxicity and metabolic adverse effects.
  • Belatacept, when added to low-dose CNI regimens and used for late conversion, improves pancreas allograft survival and reduces rejection.
  • Steroid withdrawal is successful in low immunologic risk populations when combined with effective maintenance immunosuppression.
  • mTOR inhibitors may offer benefits but are associated with higher drug intolerance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Maintenance immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation has been largely derived from kidney transplant practice. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate and corticosteroids remains the backbone of immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation. Although this regimen achieves very low rejection rates and excellent short-term survival, progressive CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, β-cell injury, and cardiovascular and metabolic adverse effects carry significant long-term consequences among pancreas transplant recipients. This review examines the utility of CNI withdrawal or minimization by utilizing belatacept and/or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and the utility of steroid-sparing regimens in pancreas transplantation. Recent Findings Belatacept is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection when used in the setting of CNI withdrawal but can be effective when added to a low-dose CNI regimen. Late conversion while maintaining a low-dose CNI is associated with better allograft survival and lower rejection rates. Steroid withdrawal can be successful in the low immunologic risk population when paired with effective adjunct maintenance immunosuppression. mTOR inhibitors are associated with higher drug intolerance but may confer benefits depending on the timing, immunologic risk and infection status. Summary Outcomes are determined by the immunosuppression that remains rather than the agent that was withdrawn. Pancreas allograft survival is impacted by the occurrence and severity of rejection regardless of the combination of immunosuppression that is utilized. An individualized approach guided by transplant type, immunologic risk, timing of intervention, and cardiometabolic and infectious risks is of utmost importance in managing immunosuppression among pancreas transplant recipients.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Current Transplantation Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Transplantation

TransplantationMedicine