The Journal of Peasant Studies· 2012Q1
Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean
- 598citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean is distinct from other regions, driven by intra-regional investors and diverse motives beyond food security, leading to land reconcentration.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Land grabbing in LAC is distinct from Africa, less focused solely on food crises.
- Key drivers include food security, energy, climate mitigation, and new capital demands.
- Intra-regional companies, often allied with international capital and states, are the main investors.
- Investments are consolidating land away from redistributive policies, leading to reconcentration.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Land grabbing has gained momentum in Latin America and the Caribbean during the past decade. The phenomenon has taken different forms and character as compared to processes that occur in other regions of the world, especially Africa. It puts into question some of the assumptions in the emerging literature on land grabbing, suggesting these are too food-centered/too food crisis-centered, too land-centred, too centred on new global food regime players – China, South Korea, Gulf States and India – and too centred on Africa. There are four key mechanisms through which land grabbing in Latin American and the Caribbean has been carried out: food security initiatives, energy/fuel security ventures, other climate change mitigation strategies, and recent demands for resources from newer hubs of global capital. The hallmark of land grabbing in the region is its intra-regional character: the key investors are (Trans-)Latin American companies, often in alliance with international capital and the central state. Initial evidence suggests that recent land investments have consolidated the earlier trend away from (re)distributive land policies in most countries in the region, and are likely to result in widespread reconcentration of land and capital.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences