PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Psychiatry· 2025Q1· Review

Interoception in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Marlene Klein, Michael Witthöft, Stefanie M. Jungmann

Short summary

Adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show no significant difference in cardiac interoceptive accuracy (cIA) compared to neurotypical controls (n=5 studies).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Meta-analysis of 5 adult studies found no significant difference in cardiac interoceptive accuracy (cIA) between ASD and neurotypical controls.
  • Descriptive summaries of children/adolescents and other interoceptive dimensions (IS, IAW) showed inconsistent findings (reduced, increased, or similar abilities).
  • Methodological diversity, measurement differences, and sample variability likely explain inconsistent findings.
  • Moderator variables like age, IQ, and comorbidities may influence interoceptive outcomes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesize current research on interoception in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) across the lifespan. A total of 31 studies meeting stringent inclusion and quality criteria were identified, incorporating both descriptive and numerical analyses of cardiac interoceptive accuracy (cIA), interoceptive sensibility (IS), and interoceptive awareness (IAW) in children, adolescents, and adults with ASD. The meta-analysis of five adult studies using comparable assessment tools found no significant differences in cIA between adults with ASD and neurotypically developed (NTD) controls [ N = 5; <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" id="im1"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math> = −.21 (SE = .11), p = .06]. Descriptive summaries of studies in children and adolescents, as well as those examining IS and IAW across age groups, revealed inconsistent findings—some studies reported reduced, increased, or similar interoceptive abilities in ASD compared to NTD. Methodological diversity, differences in measurement instruments, and variability in sample characteristics likely contribute to these inconsistencies. Moderator variables such as age, intelligence quotient (IQ), and comorbidities may influence interoceptive outcomes. Overall, the evidence indicates that ASD is not systematically associated with altered cIA, and the relationship between ASD and other interoceptive dimensions remains unclear. These findings underscore the need for more standardized methodologies and longitudinal research to clarify developmental trajectories and potential clinical implications of interoceptive processing in ASD. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms could lead interventions aimed at improving emotion regulation and social functioning in ASD. Systematic review registration https://osf.io/f3ru4 , identifier [ doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F3RU4 ].

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cognitive Neuroscience

Cognitive NeuroscienceNeuroscience