PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Dairy Science· 2014Q1· Review

Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions

J.R. Knapp, G.L. Laur, Peter A. Vadas, W.P. Weiss et al.

Short summary

Dairy farms can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions per unit of milk by combining genetic and management strategies, potentially achieving 15-30% reductions in enteric methane. Nutrition and feeding strategies offer smaller, 2.5-15% reductions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Nutrition and feeding can reduce methane emissions per unit of milk by 2.5-15%.
  • Genetic and management strategies can achieve 15-30% reductions in methane emissions per unit of milk.
  • Rumen modifiers have shown little sustained success in reducing methane without impacting milk production.
  • Herd productivity, not individual animal productivity, is key for environmental sustainability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Many opportunities exist to reduce enteric methane (CH4) and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per unit of product from ruminant livestock. Research over the past century in genetics, animal health, microbiology, nutrition, and physiology has led to improvements in dairy production where intensively managed farms have GHG emissions as low as 1 kg of CO2 equivalents (CO2e)/kg of energy-corrected milk (ECM), compared with >7 kg of CO2 e/kg of ECM in extensive systems. The objectives of this review are to evaluate options that have been demonstrated to mitigate enteric CH4 emissions per unit of ECM (CH4/ECM) from dairy cattle on a quantitative basis and in a sustained manner and to integrate approaches in genetics, feeding and nutrition, physiology, and health to emphasize why herd productivity, not individual animal productivity, is important to environmental sustainability. A nutrition model based on carbohydrate digestion was used to evaluate the effect of feeding and nutrition strategies on CH4/ECM, and a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of lipid supplementation on CH4/ECM. A second model combining herd structure dynamics and production level was used to estimate the effect of genetic and management strategies that increase milk yield and reduce culling on CH4/ECM. Some of these approaches discussed require further research, but many could be implemented now. Past efforts in CH4 mitigation have largely focused on identifying and evaluating CH4 mitigation approaches based on nutrition, feeding, and modifications of rumen function. Nutrition and feeding approaches may be able to reduce CH4/ECM by 2.5 to 15%, whereas rumen modifiers have had very little success in terms of sustained CH4 reductions without compromising milk production. More significant reductions of 15 to 30% CH4/ECM can be achieved by combinations of genetic and management approaches, including improvements in heat abatement, disease and fertility management, performance-enhancing technologies, and facility design to increase feed efficiency and life-time productivity of individual animals and herds. Many of the approaches discussed are only partially additive, and all approaches to reducing enteric CH4 emissions should consider the economic impacts on farm profitability and the relationships between enteric CH4 and other GHG.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Agronomy and Crop Science

Agronomy and Crop ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences