Language and Psychoanalysis· 2013Q3· Review
The Handbook of Conversation Analysis
- 1,614citations
- Q3SCImago
- 2013year
Short summary
This review anticipates the future development of Conversation Analysis (CA) and its applications, as predicted by leading scholars Emanuel A. Schegloff and John Heritage.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Schegloff predicted further development in understanding talk and conduct in interaction.
- Schegloff emphasized registering the particularities of talk's realization.
- Heritage foresaw a shift between basic and applied CA using qualitative and quantitative methods.
- The review frames these predictions as the future direction of Conversation Analysis.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Reviewing Conversation Analysis (CA) “at the Century’s Turn”, Emanuel A. Schegloff predicted the “further development of our understanding of the organization of talk and other conduct in interaction itself” and to “register the particularities of its realization” (Schegloff 1999, p. 142). John Heritage (1999), additionally, foresaw a future where qualitative and quantitative approaches will “shift from basic CA to ‘applied’ analysis and back again” (p. 73).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Language and Psychoanalysis, 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Language and Linguistics
Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities