Computer Assisted Language Learning· 2012Q1· Review
Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness
- 1,017citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
A review of over 350 studies reveals limited empirical evidence for technology's broad effectiveness in foreign language learning, with notable exceptions in computer-assisted pronunciation training using automatic speech recognition (ASR) and the use of chat for increasing language production.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Limited empirical evidence supports the broad effectiveness of technology in foreign language learning.
- Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) shows strong support for improving pronunciation and providing feedback.
- Chat applications significantly increase the amount and complexity of learners' language production.
- Moderate support exists for technology enhancing learner output, interaction, affect, motivation, feedback, and metalinguistic knowledge.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This review summarizes evidence for the effectiveness of technology use in foreign language (FL) learning and teaching, with a focus on empirical studies that compare the use of newer technologies with more traditional methods or materials. The review of over 350 studies (including classroom-based technologies, individual study tools, network-based social computing, and mobile and portable devices) revealed that, in spite of an abundance of publications available on the topic of technology use in FL learning and teaching, evidence of efficacy is limited. However, strong support for the claim that technology made a measurable impact in FL learning came from studies on computer-assisted pronunciation training, in particular, automatic speech recognition (ASR). These studies demonstrated that ASR can facilitate the improvement of pronunciation and can provide feedback effectively. Additional studies provided strong support for the use of chat in FL learning. These studies showed that, with chat, both the amount of learners’ language production and its complexity significantly increased. The literature revealed moderate support for claims that technology enhanced learners’ output and interaction, affect and motivation, feedback, and metalinguistic knowledge.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Language and Linguistics
Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities