Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences· 2013Q1
Genetic and archaeological perspectives on the initial modern human colonization of southern Asia
- 304citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2013year
Short summary
A new model suggests modern humans colonized southern Asia around 60-50 ka via a coastal route from East Africa, contradicting earlier 'pre-Toba' dispersal theories.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The 'pre-Toba' dispersal model (before ~74,000 years ago) for modern humans into southern Asia is inconsistent with current genetic and archaeological evidence.
- A new model supports a coastal dispersal from East Africa to southern Asia between 60,000 and 50,000 years ago.
- This migration was associated with distinctively African microlithic technologies (e.g., 'Howiesons Poort') and early symbolic behaviors (bone tools, ornaments, art).
- These technological and cultural markers align with the timing of modern human replacement of Neanderthals in Western Eurasia.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
It has been argued recently that the initial dispersal of anatomically modern humans from Africa to southern Asia occurred before the volcanic "supereruption" of the Mount Toba volcano (Sumatra) at ∼74,000 y before present (B.P.)-possibly as early as 120,000 y B.P. We show here that this "pre-Toba" dispersal model is in serious conflict with both the most recent genetic evidence from both Africa and Asia and the archaeological evidence from South Asian sites. We present an alternative model based on a combination of genetic analyses and recent archaeological evidence from South Asia and Africa. These data support a coastally oriented dispersal of modern humans from eastern Africa to southern Asia ∼60-50 thousand years ago (ka). This was associated with distinctively African microlithic and "backed-segment" technologies analogous to the African "Howiesons Poort" and related technologies, together with a range of distinctively "modern" cultural and symbolic features (highly shaped bone tools, personal ornaments, abstract artistic motifs, microblade technology, etc.), similar to those that accompanied the replacement of "archaic" Neanderthal by anatomically modern human populations in other regions of western Eurasia at a broadly similar date.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Archeology (Arts and Humanities)
ArcheologyArts and Humanities