PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Cornell University Press eBooks· 2014· Book chapter

Feeling Like Saints

Fiona Somerset

Short summary

Lollard writers, not heresy trials, reveal a medieval English religious movement focused on mutual responsibility and a saintly identity, achieved through rigorous ethics, narratives of suffering, and embracing scorn.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Lollard identity was shaped by their own writings, not solely by heresy trial records.
  • A core Lollard ethic emphasized rigorous mutual responsibility, transcending social status and personal risk.
  • Lollard writers fostered a saintly identity through narratives of suffering and embracing societal scorn.
  • The movement involved collaboration between writers and readers to produce this distinctive religious identity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract “Lollard” is the name given to followers of John Wyclif, the English dissident theologian who was dismissed from Oxford University in 1381 for his arguments regarding the eucharist. A forceful and influential critic of the ecclesiastical status quo in the late fourteenth century, Wyclif’s thought was condemned at the Council of Constance in 1415. While lollardy has attracted much attention in recent years, much of what we think we know about this English religious movement is based on records of heresy trials and anti-lollard chroniclers. This book demonstrates that this approach has limitations. A better basis is the five hundred or so manuscript books from the period (1375–1530) containing materials translated, composed, or adapted by lollard writers themselves. These writings provide rich evidence for how lollard writers collaborated with one another and with their readers to produce a distinctive religious identity based around structures of feeling. Lollards wanted to feel like saints. From Wyclif they drew an extraordinarily rigorous ethic of mutual responsibility that disregarded both social status and personal risk. They recalled their commitment to this ethic by reading narratives of physical suffering and vindication, metaphorically martyring themselves by inviting scorn for their zeal, and enclosing themselves in the virtues rather than the religious cloister. Yet in many ways they were not that different from their contemporaries, especially those with similar impulses to exceptional holiness.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cornell University Press eBooks, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Classics

ClassicsArts and Humanities