PofoliaShared via Pofolia

· 2018

Representation in Cognitive Science

Nicholas Shea

Short summary

This book proposes a novel, pluralistic account of how subpersonal mental representations acquire their content, combining naturalistic resources with insights from teleosemantics.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Proposes a naturalistic, pluralistic account for subpersonal representational content.
  • Combines correlational information, structural correspondence, and expanded etiological function.
  • Supports a distinction between descriptive and directive content.
  • Explains the distinctive explanatory power of representational explanations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The representational theory of mind (RTM) has given us the powerful insight that thinking consists of the processing of mental representations. Behaviour is the result of these cognitive processes and makes sense in the light of their contents. There is no widely accepted account of how representations get their content – of the metaphysics of representational content. That question, usually asked about representations at the personal level like beliefs and conscious states, is equally pressing for the subpersonal representations that pervade our best explanatory theories in cognitive science. This book argues that well-understood naturalistic resources can be combined to provide an account of subpersonal representational content. It shows how contents arise in a series of detailed case studies in cognitive science. The account is pluralistic, allowing that content is constituted differently in different cases. Building on insights from previous theories, especially teleosemantics, the accounts combine an appeal to correlational information and structural correspondence with an expanded notion of etiological function, which captures the kinds of stabilizing processes that give rise to content. The accounts support a distinction between descriptive and directive content. They also allow us to see how representational explanation gets its distinctive explanatory purchase.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: History and Philosophy of Science

History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities