Oxford University Press eBooks· 2018· Book chapter
Fixing Language
- 643citations
- 2018year
Short summary
This book explores how language and other representational devices can be defective and improved, examining the process and limits of conceptual amelioration across philosophy and other disciplines.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Language and representational devices can be defective and subject to improvement.
- Conceptual amelioration is a widespread phenomenon across philosophy, other disciplines, and ordinary life.
- Key questions concern the mechanism of amelioration, its limits, and its theoretical integration with language and communication.
- The book identifies a unified philosophical tradition linking Frege and Carnap to contemporary revisionist work in areas like gender, race, truth, morality, metaphysics, and philosophy of mind.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
<italic>Fixing Language</italic> is a book about ways in which language (and other representational devices) can be defective and improved. In all parts of philosophy there are philosophers who criticize the concepts we have and propose ways to improve them. Once one notices this about philosophy, it’s easy to see that revisionist projects occur in a range of other intellectual disciplines and in ordinary life. That fact gives rise to a cluster of questions: How does the process of conceptual amelioration work? What are the limits of revision (how much revision is too much)? How does the process of revision fit into an overall theory of language and communication? This book is an effort to answer those questions. In so doing, it is also an attempt to draw attention to a tradition in twentieth- and twenty-first-century philosophy that isn’t sufficiently recognized as a unified tradition. There’s a straight intellectual line from Frege (e.g. of the <italic>Begriffsschrift</italic>) and Carnap to a cluster of contemporary work that isn’t typically seen as closely related: much work on gender and race, revisionism about truth, revisionists about moral language, and revisionists in metaphysics and philosophy of mind. These views all have common core commitments: revision is both possible and important. They also face common challenges: how is amelioration done, what assumptions need to be made, e.g., about the nature of concepts, and what are the limits of revision?
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Oxford University Press eBooks, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: History and Philosophy of Science
History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities