PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Oxford University Press eBooks· 2017· Book chapter

Understanding Scientific Understanding

Henk W. de Regt

Short summary

This book develops a philosophical theory of scientific understanding, centering it as a primary aim of science rather than a byproduct of explanation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Scientific understanding is a central aim of science, distinct from scientific explanation.
  • The book develops a philosophical theory of scientific understanding.
  • It incorporates scientists' views and historical case studies from the natural sciences.
  • The theory accounts for historical variations in scientists' criteria for understanding.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This book is about scientific understanding. It is widely acknowledged that a central aim of science is to achieve understanding of the world around us, and that possessing such understanding is highly important in our present-day society. But what does it mean to achieve this understanding? What precisely is scientific understanding? These are philosophical questions that have not yet received satisfactory answers. While there has been an ongoing debate about the nature of scientific explanation since Carl Hempel advanced his covering law model in 1948, the related notion of understanding has been largely neglected because most philosophers regarded understanding as merely a subjective byproduct of objective explanations. By contrast, this book puts scientific understanding center stage. It is primarily a philosophical study, but also contains detailed historical case studies of scientific practice. In contrast to most existing studies in this area, it takes into account scientists’ views and analyzes their role in scientific debate and development. The aim of the book is to develop and defend a philosophical theory of scientific understanding that can describe and explain the historical variation of criteria for understanding actually employed by scientists. The theory does justice to the insights of such famous physicists as Werner Heisenberg and Richard Feynman, while bringing much-needed conceptual rigor to their intuitions. The scope of the proposed account of understanding is the natural sciences: while the detailed case studies derive from physics, examples from other sciences are presented to illustrate its wider validity.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Oxford University Press eBooks, 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: History and Philosophy of Science

History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities