· 2013· Review
Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought
- 448citations
- 2013year
Short summary
This book argues that traditional "inductive" reasoning is flawed and proposes an alternative scheme, drawing on Whewell, Peirce, and Popper, to better reflect how scientists actually think.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
TakeawaysIn the app
Key pointsIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: History and Philosophy of Science
History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities