PofoliaShared via Pofolia

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology· 2026Q1

Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directions

Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Shenao Wang, Haoyu Wang

Short summary

This paper introduces the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard for AI model-tool communication, and presents a comprehensive security analysis, identifying 16 threat scenarios across four attacker types and proposing tailored safeguards for its lifecycle.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard for bi-directional AI model-tool communication and dynamic discovery.
  • The paper defines the MCP server lifecycle across 4 phases and 16 activities.
  • A taxonomy identifies 16 security and privacy threat scenarios from 4 attacker types (malicious developers, external attackers, malicious users, security flaws).
  • Actionable security safeguards are proposed for each lifecycle phase and threat category.
  • The current MCP landscape, including adoption, integration, and tools, is analyzed to identify limitations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an emerging open standard that defines a unified, bi-directional communication and dynamic discovery protocol between AI models and external tools or resources, aiming to enhance interoperability and reduce fragmentation across diverse systems. This paper conducts a systematic study of MCP from both architectural and security perspectives. We first define the full lifecycle of an MCP server, comprising four phases (creation, deployment, operation, and maintenance), further decomposed into 16 key activities that capture its functional evolution. Building on this lifecycle analysis, we construct a comprehensive threat taxonomy that categorizes security and privacy risks across four major attacker types: malicious developers, external attackers, malicious users, and security flaws, encompassing 16 distinct threat scenarios. To validate these risks, we develop and analyze real-world case studies that demonstrate concrete attack surfaces and vulnerability manifestations within MCP implementations. Based on these findings, the paper proposes a set of fine-grained, actionable security safeguards tailored to each lifecycle phase and threat category, offering practical guidance for secure MCP adoption. We also analyze the current MCP landscape, covering industry adoption, integration patterns, and supporting tools, to identify its technological strengths as well as existing limitations that constrain broader deployment. Finally, we outline future research and development directions aimed at strengthening MCP’s standardization, trust boundaries, and sustainable growth within the evolving ecosystem of tool-augmented AI systems. All collected data and implementation examples are publicly available at https://github.com/security-pride/MCP_Landscape .

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Artificial Intelligence

Artificial IntelligenceComputer Science