ACM Computing Surveys· 2026Q1· Review
A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiency
- 12citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
This survey introduces a new taxonomy for federated learning (FL) by categorizing methods based on whether they share models, synthetic data, or knowledge, offering a novel perspective on FL research.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces a new taxonomy for federated learning (FL) based on three sharing methods: model parameters, synthetic data, and knowledge.
- Analyzes the vulnerability of different sharing methods to privacy attacks and reviews existing defense mechanisms.
- Compares the learning performance and communication overhead of various sharing methods through extensive experiments.
- Assesses potential privacy leakage via model inversion and membership inference attacks and compares defense effectiveness.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a secure paradigm for collaborative training among clients. Without data centralization, FL allows clients to share local information in a privacy-preserving manner. This approach has gained considerable attention, promoting numerous surveys to summarize the related works. However, the majority of these surveys concentrate on FL methods that share model parameters during the training process, while overlooking the possibility of sharing local information in other forms. In this paper, we present a systematic survey from a new perspective of what to share in FL, with an emphasis on the model utility, privacy leakage, and communication efficiency. First, we present a new taxonomy of FL methods in terms of three sharing methods, which respectively share model, synthetic data, and knowledge. Second, we analyze the vulnerability of different sharing methods to privacy attacks and review the defense mechanisms. Third, we conduct extensive experiments to compare the learning performance and communication overhead of various sharing methods in FL. Besides, we assess the potential privacy leakage through model inversion and membership inference attacks, while comparing the effectiveness of various defense approaches. Finally, we identify future research directions and conclude the survey.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. ACM Computing Surveys, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Artificial Intelligence
Artificial IntelligenceComputer Science