PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Dental Journal· 2026Q1· Review

No-Code and Low-Code Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Imaging: A Scoping Review

Manal Hamdan, Zaid Badr, Sergio Uribe, Marcel Reymus et al.

Short summary

No-code/low-code/AutoML AI approaches show promise for clinician-driven healthcare imaging development, particularly in dentistry (11 studies) for tasks like caries detection, though generalisability and regulatory compliance remain limitations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 138 studies reviewed on LCNC/AutoML in healthcare imaging, with 127 in medical and 11 in dental imaging.
  • Dental LCNC/AutoML applications focused on classification, object detection, and segmentation for caries, restorations, and staging.
  • Medical imaging studies utilized LCNC/AutoML more broadly across specialties for diagnostic and prognostic classification.
  • LCNC/AutoML models demonstrated promising performance, but external validation was inconsistently reported.
  • Limitations include generalisability, regulatory compliance, and task complexity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The aim of this review was to evaluate applications, methodological characteristics, limitations and future directions of no-code, low-code and automated machine learning (LCNC/AutoML) approaches in healthcare imaging. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched using terms related to no-code artificial intelligence (AI), low-code AI, and AutoML combined with medical and dental imaging keywords. Studies were included if they applied LCNC or AutoML approaches to healthcare imaging tasks. Data extraction focused on platform type, imaging modality, clinical domain, task type and reported performance metrics. RESULTS: One-hundred thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including 127 medical and 11 dental imaging studies. Dental applications were limited to no-code platforms and focused on classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks, primarily involving caries detection, restoration identification and developmental staging. Medical imaging studies demonstrated broader adoption across specialties and imaging modalities, frequently employing AutoML or low-code frameworks for diagnostic and prognostic classification predominantly. Overall, LCNC/AutoML models showed promising performance, though external validation was inconsistently reported. CONCLUSIONS: LCNC/AutoML platforms might enable clinician-driven AI development for imaging tasks in dentistry and screening-focused medical applications. While these approaches lower technical barriers and may mitigate distribution shift through localised model training and application, limitations related to generalisability, regulatory compliance and task complexity persist. LCNC/AutoML tools are best positioned as complementary, context-specific solutions rather than replacements for traditional AI development. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accessible AI development platforms may facilitate broader clinician participation in imaging research and support the development of locally tailored diagnostic tools, particularly in resource-limited or emerging research environments such as dental imaging.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Dental Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Oral Surgery

Oral SurgeryDentistry