PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Acta Psychologica· 2025Q1

Learners' AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy

Jinrui Tian, Ronghua Zhang

Short summary

Increased AI dependence among 580 university students was linked to lower critical thinking, with cognitive fatigue acting as a partial mediator.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Higher AI dependence correlated with reduced critical thinking in 580 university students.
  • Cognitive fatigue partially mediated the negative relationship between AI dependence and critical thinking.
  • Information literacy buffered the negative effect of AI dependence on critical thinking.
  • Information literacy amplified cognitive fatigue when AI reliance was high.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, understanding its cognitive implications has become increasingly important. This study examines how university students' AI dependence influences their critical thinking, exploring cognitive fatigue as a mediating mechanism and information literacy as a moderating factor. Data were collected from 580 Chinese university students, and a moderated mediation model (PROCESS Model 8) was tested. Results indicated that greater AI dependence was associated with lower levels of critical thinking, with cognitive fatigue partially mediating this relationship. Information literacy buffered the negative impact of AI dependence on critical thinking but also amplified cognitive fatigue when AI reliance was high. These findings extend theories of cognitive offloading and automation bias by revealing the dual role of information literacy in AI-supported learning. Practical implications include the need for digital literacy programs and instructional designs that manage cognitive fatigue in AI-integrated education.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Acta Psychologica, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Social Psychology

Social PsychologyPsychology