PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Lancet· 2026

Fabricated citations: an audit across 2·5 million biomedical papers

Maxim Topaz, Nir Roguin, Pallavi Gupta, Zhihong Zhang et al.

Short summary

An audit of 2.5 million biomedical papers revealed that fabricated citations, which point to non-existent studies, are present in the scientific literature.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A large-scale audit examined 2.5 million biomedical papers.
  • Fabricated citations, referencing non-existent studies, were identified.
  • These fabricated references undermine the verifiability of scientific claims.
  • The presence of fabricated citations impacts readers, reviewers, and policymakers.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Scientific literature depends on the integrity of its references. Each reference implicitly asserts that a verifiable source exists and supports the claims being made. When references point to non-existent studies, readers, reviewers, and policy makers are unable to evaluate the evidence.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Lancet, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: History and Philosophy of Science Safety Research

Safety ResearchSocial SciencesHistory and Philosophy of Science