Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research· 2026Q1
Short‐Term Changes in the Occlusal Contacts During Anterior Segmental Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligners in Adult Patients
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Clear aligner treatment with 14 aligners achieved 33.41 mm² less posterior occlusal contact area than predicted, with significant reductions observed at premolars and molars.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Achieved posterior occlusal contact area was 33.41 mm² less than predicted after 14 clear aligners (30.30 mm² vs 63.71 mm²).
- Significant reductions in achieved contact area were observed at first premolars (-3.09 mm²), second premolars (-5.44 mm²), first molars (-11.46 mm²), and second molars (-13.42 mm²).
- The achieved central incisor contact area was slightly greater than predicted (+0.49 mm²).
- No programmed posterior movement was included in the initial treatment plan.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective To compare ClinCheck‐predicted and achieved maxillary occlusal contact areas immediately after an initial 14‐aligner anterior segmental sequence without programmed posterior movement. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 31 adult women treated with 14 maxillary and mandibular clear aligners. Bilateral first premolars through second molars were digitally locked. Predicted stage‐14 models and intraoral scans obtained immediately after aligner 14 and before refinement were assessed at maximum intercuspation. Contact regions at 0.00‐mm clearance were quantified with ImageJ. The primary outcome was the patient‐level total posterior achieved‐minus‐predicted difference. Tooth‐type differences were analysed using patient‐clustered generalized estimating equations with Holm adjustment; bite‐ramp comparisons were exploratory. Results Predicted and achieved total posterior areas were 63.71 ± 36.56 and 30.30 ± 18.26 mm 2 , respectively (mean difference, −33.41 mm 2 ; 95% CI, −44.42 to −22.40; p < 0.001). After Holm adjustment, the achieved central‐incisor area was 0.49 mm 2 greater than predicted ( p = 0.003), whereas areas were smaller at the first premolars, second premolars, first molars, and second molars by 3.09, 5.44, 11.46, and 13.42 mm 2 , respectively (adjusted p ≤ 0.016). Lateral‐incisor and canine differences were not significant. Bite‐ramp groups did not differ significantly. Conclusion After 14 aligners, the achieved posterior contact area was substantially smaller than predicted despite no programmed posterior movement. This early discrepancy supports direct evaluation of posterior contacts before refinement.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthodontics
OrthodonticsDentistry