PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Environmental Science & Technology· 2026Q1

Estimation of Property Value Changes from Nearby Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Projects in the United States

Kaifang Luo, Yueming Qiu, Pengfei Liu, Yingdan Mei

Short summary

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) projects increase nearby housing prices by 3.90% ($8582) on average within 4.2 km, with effects varying by facility type and distance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CCUS projects increase housing prices by an average of 3.90% ($8582) within 4.2 km.
  • Housing price premiums are observed at moderate distances (3–4.2 km) for capture facilities and within 1 km for storage facilities.
  • The observed price increases are attributable to CCUS itself, not just the presence of industrial facilities.
  • Findings are based on a hedonic difference-in-differences framework using property-level housing transaction data (1990–2021).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is vital to decarbonization, but its socioeconomic impact on nearby communities remains understudied. Using property-level housing transaction data (1990–2021) matched to nationwide CCUS project records, we apply a hedonic difference-in-differences framework to quantify the net impact of CCUS proximity on nearby housing prices. CCUS operations generate a price premium of 3.90% ($8582 on average) for homes within 4.2 km, with no effect beyond this distance. Effects vary by facility type and distance: capture facilities raise values at moderate distances (3–4.2 km), consistent with spillovers from job creation, while storage facilities generate more localized premiums within 1 km, reflecting direct financial compensation to nearby landowners. These estimates reflect the incremental effect of CCUS equipment on housing prices near the host facility, not the net effect of the plant plus CCUS relative to no facility at all, and could differ if the two were considered jointly. A triple-difference comparison against matched non-CCUS facilities of the same industry and scale confirms that CCUS itself, rather than the presence of an industrial facility generally, drives this incremental effect. Our findings provide revealed-preference evidence that communities perceive a net positive value from nearby CCUS projects, informing siting and benefit-sharing policy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Environmental Science & Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Economics and Econometrics

Economics and EconometricsEconomics, Econometrics and Finance