PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PLoS Pathogens· 2026Q1

Dual plasmepsin IX and X inhibitors are refractory to development of resistance

Paola Favuzza, Madeline G. Dans, Wenyin Su, Jennifer K. Thompson et al.

Short summary

Dual plasmepsin IX/X (PMIX/X) inhibitors for malaria treatment could not be selected for resistance, even under prolonged pressure, unlike PMX-selective inhibitors which showed reduced sensitivity via gene amplification and mutations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Dual PMIX/X inhibitors could not be selected for resistance in P. falciparum, even with prolonged selection pressure.
  • PMX-selective inhibitors showed reduced sensitivity due to pmx gene amplification and mutations (e.g., D245N, S315P) that impair inhibitor binding.
  • Dual PMIX/X inhibitors retained efficacy against parasites resistant to PMX-selective compounds.
  • Antimalarial Resistome Barcoding (AReBar) assays confirmed no pre-existing resistance to either inhibitor class.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) remain the cornerstone of malaria treatment, but emerging resistance threatens their efficacy. The potential for the development of drug resistance against plasmepsin X (PMX)-selective inhibitors and dual plasmepsin IX/X (PMIX/X) inhibitors was investigated in Plasmodium falciparum. A series of PMX-selective (WM4, WM76, WM92) and PMIX/X dual inhibitors (WM382, WM09, WM42) were characterised for potency against parasite growth and enzyme inhibition. In vitro selection experiments showed that all compounds had a high barrier to resistance, although parasites with reduced sensitivity to PMX‑selective inhibitors could still be selected. Resistance mechanisms involved pmx gene amplification and point mutations (D245N, S315P, S359P, I363L) that alter inhibitor binding. Recombinant expression and Michaelis-Menten kinetics demonstrated that these mutations impair drug binding whilst preserving PMX catalytic function. Reverse genetics confirmed that introducing these mutations into the pmx gene resulted in decreased potency of the inhibitors. In this study, resistance to the PMIX/X dual inhibitors evaluated here could not be selected, despite prolonged selection pressure. Antimalarial Resistome Barcoding (AReBar) assays confirmed the absence of pre-existing resistance to either inhibitor class. Critically, PMIX/X dual inhibitors maintained efficacy against parasites with decreased sensitivity to PMX-selective compounds. These findings demonstrate that dual PMIX/X inhibitors present a substantially higher barrier to resistance than PMX-selective inhibitors, informing antimalarial drug development strategies and highlighting dual-target inhibition as a promising approach to mitigate resistance risks.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS Pathogens, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthMedicine