PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Finance and Stochastics· 2026Q1

Risk sharing with lambda value-at-risk under heterogeneous beliefs

Peng Liu, Andreas Tsanakas, Yunran Wei

Short summary

This paper derives semi-explicit formulas for risk sharing using lambda value-at-risk (λVaR) under heterogeneous beliefs, showing how belief differences impact optimal allocations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Develops semi-explicit formulas for inf-convolution of multiple λVaR measures under heterogeneous beliefs.
  • Obtains explicit forms for optimal risk allocations in a multi-agent setting with differing beliefs.
  • Analyzes the impact of belief heterogeneity through cases of homogeneous, conditional, and general beliefs.
  • Shows that high belief inconsistency and risk tolerance result in trivial risk sharing outcomes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we study the risk sharing problem among multiple agents using lambda value-at-risk as their preference functional, under heterogeneous beliefs, where each agent’s belief is represented by a probability measure. We obtain semi-explicit formulas for the inf-convolution of multiple lambda value-at-risk measures under heterogeneous beliefs and the explicit forms of the corresponding optimal allocations. To show the impact of belief heterogeneity, we consider three cases: homogeneous beliefs, conditional beliefs, and general beliefs with two agents. For those cases, we find more explicit expressions for the inf-convolution, showing the influence of the relation of the beliefs on the inf-convolution. Moreover, we consider in a two-agent setting the inf-convolution of one lambda value-at-risk and a general risk measure, including expected utility, distortion risk measures and lambda value-at-risk as special cases, with differing beliefs. The expression of the inf-convolution and the form of an optimal allocation are obtained. In all above cases, we demonstrate that trivial outcomes arise when both belief inconsistency and risk tolerance are high. Finally, we discuss risk sharing for an alternative definition of lambda value-at-risk.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Finance and Stochastics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Economics and Econometrics

Economics and EconometricsEconomics, Econometrics and Finance