JAMA Network Open· 2026Q1
Cefepime and Mortality
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A meta-analysis of 110 randomized trials (22,608 patients) found a 94.4% probability that cefepime is associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to other beta-lactams (OR 1.10).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Cefepime use was associated with a 94.4% probability of increased all-cause mortality compared to other beta-lactams across 110 trials (22,608 patients).
- The pooled odds ratio for mortality with cefepime was 1.10 (95% credible interval, 0.98-1.24).
- In published peer-reviewed trials (73 trials, 15,411 patients), cefepime showed a 98.6% probability of higher mortality (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34).
- Higher mortality odds with cefepime were observed across comparator beta-lactams, clinical indications, and with doses of 2g or more every 12 hours.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Importance: Cefepime is recommended for the treatment of febrile neutropenia and gram-negative infections at moderate risk of ampicillin resistance locus C β-lactamase production. Concerns regarding cefepime's safety have been raised in the literature without firm conclusions. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and bayesian random-effects meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing cefepime with other β-lactams for all-cause mortality. Data Sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, World Health Organization-International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS were searched from inception to May 25, 2026. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of children and adults comparing either (1) cefepime monotherapy vs any β-lactam monotherapy or (2) combination therapy of cefepime and a second drug vs β-lactam and the same second drug. Studies of prophylactic cefepime or cefepime and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, version 2.0. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was all-cause mortality (30-day or closest reported). Odds of mortality were synthesized using a hierarchical bayesian random-effects model on the log-odds scale. The posterior probabilities of increased mortality (odds ratio [OR] >1) with cefepime for the overall analysis and relevant subgroups were examined. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. Results: Synthesis of 110 trials including 22 608 patients (cefepime: 11 726 patients [approximately 56% male]; comparator β-lactam: 10 882 patients [approximately 56% male]) showed a 94.4% posterior probability that the pooled OR mortality exceeded 1 with cefepime use compared with other β-lactams (778 [6.6%] vs 674 [6.2%]; OR, 1.10, 95% credible interval, 0.98-1.24). Meta-analysis of published peer-reviewed RCTs (73 trials, 15 411 patients) showed that cefepime was associated with a 98.6% posterior probability of higher mortality compared with other β-lactams (OR, 1.17; 95% credible interval, 1.02-1.34). Posterior distributions generally favored higher odds of mortality across all comparator β-lactams, across all clinical indications, and with doses of 2 g or more every 12 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis found that cefepime was associated with higher odds of all-cause mortality compared with other β-lactams. These findings support a nuanced discussion of cefepime's safety in guidance statements.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. JAMA Network Open, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pharmacology (Medicine)
PharmacologyMedicine