Journal of Texture Studies· 2026Q2
chewR : An Open‐Source R Package for Quantifying Masticatory Performance With Applications in Oral Processing Research
- 1citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new open-source R package, chewR, quantifies masticatory performance using automated image analysis of a 2-color gum mixing task, showing strong convergent validity with proprietary software (r's = ±0.81).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The chewR R package quantifies masticatory performance via automated image analysis of a 2-color gum mixing task.
- chewR's raw and transformed masticatory performance scores showed strong convergent validity with the proprietary ViewGum Score (r's = ±0.81, p < 0.00001).
- The transformed chewR score had weak associations with carrot eating rate (r = 0.12), self-reported eating rate (r = 0.20), and stimulated salivary flow (r = 0.21).
- chewR is presented as an open-source, user-friendly alternative to existing methods for quantifying masticatory performance.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Masticatory performance is a measure of oral physiology that affects food breakdown and eating behavior. Existing methods to quantify masticatory performance rely on labor-intensive procedures (e.g., sieving expectorated samples), or proprietary software (e.g., ViewGum), limiting adoption and reproducibility. In this cross-sectional methods validation study, we: (1) examine the convergent validity of chewR, a user-friendly R package that quantifies masticatory performance in a 2-color gum mixing task via automated image analysis, and (2) examine how chewR based masticatory performance measures relate to other oral processing behaviors. Adults (n = 47, 601% female) completed a laboratory visit with a 2-colored gum mixing task, stimulated salivary flow, and eating rate objectively measured using Tang's carrot test. Chewed gum samples were flattened with a standardized method, scanned, and resulting images were analyzed using ViewGum and chewR. ViewGum generates a score based on the gum color mixing, with lower scores indicating greater masticatory performance. chewR produces a raw score based on gum color mixing; from this, a transformed chewR Masticatory Performance Score was calculated, with higher values indicating greater masticatory performance. chewR measures showed strong convergent validity with ViewGum Score: the raw chewR score and transformed chewR Masticatory Performance Score were each strongly correlated with ViewGum Score (r's = ±0.81, p < 0.00001), with signs in expected directions. Regarding predictive validity, the transformed chewR Masticatory Performance Score was weakly associated with carrot eating rate (r = 0.12), self-reported eating rate (r = 0.20), and stimulated salivary flow (r = 0.21); the same associations were similarly weak for ViewGum Score. These findings support chewR as an open-source alternative to ViewGum to quantify masticatory performance in a gum mixing task.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Texture Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy
Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions