PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Optics & Laser Technology· 2026Q1

A numerical study on the effect of laser beam shaping on surface roughness and texture in laser powder bed fusion

W. E. Alphonso, Hao-Ping Yeh, Richard Rothfelder, Schmidt, Michael Anthony, 1980- et al.

Short summary

A CFD model shows that a Ring-spot laser beam profile reduces surface roughness (Sa, Sq, Sz by ~10.2%, ~36.2%, ~44.9% respectively) and makes surface texture more isotropic compared to a Gaussian profile in 3D printing of 316L stainless steel.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A Ring-spot beam profile (RSBP) reduces surface roughness (Sa, Sq, Sz) by ~10.2%, ~36.2%, and ~44.9% respectively, compared to a Gaussian beam profile (GBP) in 3D printing.
  • RSBP leads to a more isotropic surface texture, with the Str index increasing from 0.0714 to 0.1429.
  • Increasing laser power to 300 W with RSBP eliminates open pore defects while maintaining superior surface quality.
  • Abbott–Firestone analysis indicates fewer high peaks and a narrower functional core height with RSBP.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Spatial laser beam shaping is investigated to assess its influence on surface roughness in laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) of 316L stainless steel. A high-fidelity CFD model developed in FLOW-3D simulates Gaussian (GBP) and Ring-spot (RSBP) beam profiles, resolving laser absorption, free-surface evolution, recoil pressure, and Marangoni flow. Analytical heat sources are calibrated to measured beam profiles, and the predictions are validated against single-track melt-pool cross-sections (RMSE ≈ 6.5%) and single-layer surface topography. Under baseline conditions, the RSBP produces a wider and shallower melt pool that suppresses tail-end humping and reduces surface roughness, with simulated decreases of ~10.2% in Sa, ~36.2% in Sq, and ~44.9% in Sz relative to the GBP. Texture becomes more isotropic with the RSBP, as indicated by the Str index increasing from 0.0714 to 0.1429. Although open pores appear on RSBP surfaces at baseline power, increasing the laser power to 300 W eliminates these defects while maintaining superior surface quality compared to the GBP. Abbott–Firestone analysis shows a lower Smr1 for the RSBP, indicating fewer high peaks and a narrower functional core height. The simulations reproduce these experimental trends, establishing a predictive link between beam profile, melt-pool morphology, and resulting surface roughness and texture.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Optics & Laser Technology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Mechanical Engineering

Mechanical EngineeringEngineering