PofoliaShared via Pofolia

steel research international· 2026Q2

High‐Strength Austenitic Stainless Steels for High‐Pressure Hydrogen Applications

Andreas Drexler, Jan Platl, Rainer Fluch, Andreas Andracher et al.

Short summary

High-strength austenitic stainless steels (P511, P513, P568, P569, T200) show improved resistance to hydrogen embrittlement (HE) compared to standard grade 316L, with austenite stability being the key factor.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • High-strength austenitic stainless steels (P511, P513, P568, P569, T200) were tested for hydrogen embrittlement (HE) resistance.
  • Austenite stability was identified as the primary factor influencing HE susceptibility.
  • The tested high-strength steels demonstrated superior HE resistance compared to standard grade 316L.
  • Two new risk assessment maps are proposed for classifying HE resistivity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Hydrogen embrittlement (HE) poses the risk of premature failure in high‐pressure hydrogen applications, such as storage tanks, pressure sensors, valves, pipes, and compressors. Especially, high‐strength martensitic or ferritic steels are most susceptible to hydrogen, which limits lightweight design for many future energy applications. Due to the utilization of hydrogen as a green energy carrier, efforts are made to improve the resistance of steels to HE at elevated pressures and low temperatures. For that purpose, a performance screening of high‐strength austenitic stainless steels is performed using slow strain rate testing. Different high strength austenitic stainless steels, such as Böhler P511/Nitronic 50, Böhler P513/Nitronic 60, Böhler P568, Böhler P569, and Böhler T200/A286, were tested and ranked with respect to the nickel and chromium equivalents and the martensite start temperatures M s and M d30 . The results were benchmarked with standard stainless austenitic grade 316L. It is shown that the austenite stability is the main factor of influence with respect to the HE susceptibility. Furthermore, the roles of chromium and nitrogen were evaluated and discussed. Finally, two new risk assessment maps are proposed, which allow a simplified classification of the HE resistivity based on the chemical composition, temperature, and strain.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. steel research international, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Metals and Alloys

Metals and AlloysMaterials Science