PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Behaviour Research and Therapy· 2026Q1

Predicting patient outcomes from initial in-session interactions within cognitive behavioral therapy and person-centered experiential therapy for severe depression

Sam Malins, D. H. Saxon, Grazziela P. Figueredo, Jérémie Clos et al.

Short summary

Patients' engagement with action planning in the first session of CBT or PCET for severe depression predicted greater improvement, while spending more time on administrative tasks predicted poorer outcomes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Engagement in therapy-related action planning during the first session predicted greater depression improvement in both CBT and PCET.
  • Spending more time on administrative tasks (e.g., completing measures) rather than discussing their implications predicted poorer outcomes in both therapies.
  • In CBT, identifying protective factors in session one predicted better outcomes.
  • In PCET, discussing patients' problems and contexts in session one predicted better outcomes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and person-centered experiential therapy (PCET) are the most frequently delivered individual psychological therapies in the UK National Health Service Talking Therapies program. However, many patients do not benefit from treatment and motivational processes early in therapy may influence outcomes. This study assessed specific, in-session interaction-types at the first session of CBT and PCET for severe depression that may predict therapeutic outcomes. METHOD: Trained raters assessed active engagement in specific interactions from 103 first session transcripts of CBT (n = 40) and PCET (n = 63) for severe depression from a non-inferiority, pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Multilevel modelling and logistic regressions were used to evaluate whether initial patient-therapist interactions predicted depression change across therapy. RESULTS: In both CBT and PCET, patients' engagement with therapy-related action planning at initial sessions predicted greater improvement in depression. Conversely, where more time was taken with administrative aspects of completing measures (as opposed to discussing the implications of results) at first sessions, poorer outcomes ensued in both therapies. In CBT alone, engagement in identifying protective factors at session one predicted greater outcome improvement. In PCET alone, where more of session one was spent discussing patients' problems and contexts, greater outcome improvements followed. CONCLUSION: Specific interaction-types at first sessions of CBT and PCET for severe depression may predict outcomes, with key similarities and differences. Initial sessions cannot be considered solely information gathering and assessment processes. Identification and deliberate practice of prognostic interactions could improve therapeutic skills and outcomes from early sessions.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Clinical Psychology

Clinical PsychologyPsychology