Urban Planning· 2026Q2
Digital Waste and Communicative Noise in Age‐Friendly Municipal Communication
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Municipal digital communication generates significant communicative noise (mean=0.41) and digital waste (mean=0.33), with fragmentation and incoherence being primary inefficiencies, impacting cognitive accessibility (mean=0.34) for older adults.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Communicative noise (mean=0.41) is a greater inefficiency in municipal digital communication than digital waste (mean=0.33).
- Fragmentation and navigation incoherence are the main drivers of communicative noise.
- Cognitive accessibility (mean=0.34) significantly outpaces institutional orientation toward older adults (mean=0.28) in digital environments.
- 35% of analyzed municipalities exhibit critical systems, indicating significant structural dysfunctions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article conceptualizes municipal digital communication as an urban infrastructure that generates cognitive externalities, thereby contributing to debates on the (un)sustainability of digitalization. While the literature has paid more attention to the material- and energy-related impacts of digital infrastructures, it has somewhat overlooked how these systems shape access to, understanding of, and use of public information. To fill this gap, this study develops an integrated analytical model based on four dimensions: digital waste, communicative noise, cognitive accessibility, and institutional orientation toward older adults. Empirically, the analysis is based on a systematic content analysis of the digital communication infrastructures of 20 municipalities belonging to the Spanish Network of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. Composite indices capture structural dysfunctions and communicative capacities through descriptive and configurational analyses. Communicative noise (mean = 0.41) is more prevalent than digital waste (mean = 0.33), indicating that fragmentation and navigation incoherence are the main sources of inefficiency. A further gap between cognitive accessibility (mean = 0.34) and institutional orientation toward older adults (mean = 0.28) undercuts the inclusiveness of digital environments. The configurational analysis identifies critical systems as the largest group (35%), followed by advanced and hybrid systems (20% each), while three cases remain indeterminate because of missing dysfunction data. The article introduces communicative sustainability as an emergent condition for realizing public value through urban digital infrastructures.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Urban Planning, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Demography
DemographySocial Sciences